Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:
The article from the South China Morning Post highlights several key issues regarding China’s shifting stance on North Korea. Here are the main points:
Deteriorating Influence: China’s influence over North Korea is diminishing, exacerbated by North Korea’s growing alignment with Russia. This realignment has implications for regional security, especially with NATO’s expansion into Asia and the strengthening of maritime military networks in the Indo-Pacific.
Russian Impact: The Ukraine conflict has unintentionally impacted China’s regional interests, with North Korea’s support for Putin’s war creating further complications for Beijing. This situation underscores the need for a strategic shift in China’s approach to North Korea.
China’s Strategy: The article suggests that China must move from a defensive engagement strategy to a more assertive one. China’s current passive stance and reluctance to fully enforce UN sanctions, such as repatriating North Korean workers, have not been effective.
Declining Relations: Relations between China and North Korea have deteriorated, illustrated by declining trade and Kim Jong-un’s apparent distrust of China. The historical alliance between the two countries is now strained, with North Korea acting increasingly independently.
Geopolitical Risks: The deepening North Korea-Russia alliance poses several risks for China:
Associative Risks: China risks being linked with North Korea and Russia, potentially affecting its international standing.
Increased Conflict Risks: North Korea’s alignment with Russia raises the risk of regional conflict, which could impact China’s security.
Strategic Partnerships: China aims to strengthen ties with South Korea and Japan, which could be hindered by North Korea’s actions and its military alignment with Russia.
Overall, the article argues for a reassessment of China’s policy towards North Korea, suggesting that a more proactive and strategic approach is necessary to address these evolving challenges.
Read more below.
As China’s leverage on North Korea slips, it’s time for a new approach
The close alignment between North Korea and Russia is also detrimental to China due to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s (Nato) swift expansion into Asia. The Nato-IP4 security alignment has led to the creation of a robust maritime military network in the Indo-Pacific region. China’s maritime security zone has become a potentially perilous area.
It’s likely that Russian President Vladimir Putin did not foresee that his war in Ukraine would cast such ominous shadows over Asia, and especially China. This situation underscores the lesson that many wars stem from political leaders’ misperceptions and misjudgments.
From this viewpoint, China’s discomfort with the North Korea-Russia alignment is evident. China is understandably concerned about Kim Jong-un’s willingness to get involved in Putin’s risky war ventures. This highlights the urgent need for China to transition its North Korean strategy from defensive engagement to a more assertive approach.
Beijing’s approach has gained attention amid rumours about a supposed shift in its stance on repatriating tens of thousands of North Korean workers. The situation might have reached a point where China can no longer disregard UN Security Council Resolution 2397, which calls for their repatriation.
Suspected riots among these workers due to unpaid wages may heighten the likelihood that China pursues a tougher stance in light of the North Korea-Russia alignment. However, given China’s foreign policy approach, particularly its preference for behind-the-scenes diplomacy, it is unlikely that it will enforce full repatriation.
But amid deepened ties between North Korea and Russia, there has been a decline in maritime trade between North Korea and China. Furthermore, the Chinese ambassador in Pyongyang was reportedly absent from an anti-American rally held in Pyongyang on the anniversary of the Korean war. South Korean experts interpret these development as indications that China has started putting pressure on North Korea.
The blood alliance that formed after the Korean war has evolved into a dynamic where North Korea perceives China as an unreliable partner, while China regards North Korea as a troublesome ally. This is vividly illustrated by Kim Jong-un’s rumoured distrust towards China. In his memoir, former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo claimed that Kim had told him that if US troops withdrew from the Korean peninsula, North Korea would become a peripheral region of China.
North Korea’s ambivalent attitude towards China hasn’t emerged overnight. North Korea’s deep commitment to political sovereignty has led it to frequently act independently of China.
At the same time, China has not treated North Korea as a genuine ally; rather, it has maintained a passive stance, adhering to a policy of preserving the status quo on the Korean peninsula. This approach has ultimately backfired, pushing the bilateral relationship towards a breaking point.
China’s approach to North Korea has not been successful. It has permitted North Korea to become a nuclear missile power and also led to the collapse of pro-China factions within North Korea.
China must move from a strategy of persuasion to one of more aggressive engagement and swiftly adjust how it uses its leverage over North Korea. Meanwhile, the US-South Korea alliance has inadvertently given North Korea too many opportunities to learn from the actions of its rivals, making standard methods of pressure insufficient to alter Pyongyang’s behaviour.
China has several practical reasons to adopt an offensive engagement approach. First, it wants to avoid being associated with North Korea and Russia. With Putin already facing an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC), there is increasing pressure for Kim, who has supported Putin’s war, to also be referred to the ICC. As a permanent member of the UN Security Council and an ally of North Korea, China has exceeded its red line in supporting and tolerating Kim’s behaviour.
03:05
Putin, Kim sign ‘strongest ever’ defence treaty amid growing tensions with the West
Putin, Kim sign ‘strongest ever’ defence treaty amid growing tensions with the West
Second, as North Korea deepens its alignment with Russia, the risk of conflict on the Korean peninsula has increased, leading to a stronger security alliance among South Korea, the US and Japan. If North Korea were to become a military outpost for Russia, it would directly threaten China’s security.
Third, China seeks to maintain and strengthen the geopolitical symbiosis and mutual prosperity framework with South Korea and Japan in Northeast Asia. This trilateral cooperation not only mitigates regional geopolitical tensions but also serves as a catalyst for enhancing the safety of the Korean peninsula.
As long as China remains mired in the historical Northern triangle alliance, it risks substantial setbacks to its security and its Belt and Road Initiative. The Chinese leadership must acknowledge that the close ties between North Korea and Russia are now testing China’s diplomatic capabilities.
By: Lee Min-Yong – a visiting professor in the School of Global Service at Sookmyung Women’s University, South Korea