By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    Damaged Su-57 highlights the Vulnerability of Russian Airbases Near Ukraine
    April 13, 2025
    Beyond competition: How Europe can harness the UAE’s energy ambitions in Africa
    April 13, 2025
    A Putin summer surprise for NATO? Worries are growing.
    August 11, 2024
    Latest News
    Trump’s South Africa Standoff
    May 28, 2025
    Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
    May 28, 2025
    Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground
    May 28, 2025
    Why a Stronger Yuan Could Be China’s Boldest Bet Yet
    May 28, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    SAFE Plan Puts Turkey’s EU Role Back in Spotlight
    May 28, 2025
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    IAEA Raises Fresh Alarm on Global Nuclear Security Amid Rise in Radioactive Incidents
    March 2, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Trump’s South Africa Standoff
    May 28, 2025
    Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
    May 28, 2025
    Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground
    May 28, 2025
    Why a Stronger Yuan Could Be China’s Boldest Bet Yet
    May 28, 2025
    Trump’s Self-Sabotage Is Hurting the Dollar—and America’s Future
    May 28, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: The End of Soft Power?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > The End of Soft Power?
CommentaryGeopolitics

The End of Soft Power?

Last updated: August 11, 2024 6:50 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published June 30, 2024 401 Views 7 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics

Joseph S. Nye Jr. explores the relevance of soft power amid current global conflicts. He argues that despite the resurgence of hard power, soft power—shaping others’ preferences through attraction rather than coercion—remains vital. Historical and contemporary examples, such as the US influence during the Cold War and China’s struggles to enhance its soft power, illustrate its enduring importance. Nye emphasizes that effective use of both hard and soft power is crucial for national strategy and global influence.

For further details, read the article here.


In a world marked by wars in Ukraine and Gaza, is the age of soft power over? Thirty years ago, with the end of the Soviet Union, increasing integration in Europe, and America’s “Unipolar Moment,” the prospects for inter-state war seemed low. Some observers argued that the age of hard power was diminishing, and the world was entering an era of soft power. That clearly turned out to be wrong, but that was never my view. I formulated the concept of soft power during the Cold War and argued that it was relevant to realism and conflict as well as peace.

Soft power is the ability to affect others through attraction rather than coercion or payment, and it is relevant in both war and peace. In the Seven Year’s War of the eighteenth century, Russia dropped out of the coalition massed against Prussia because Czar Peter III (newly anointed in the course of the conflict) was a fan of Frederick the Great. Usually, however, its effects are slow and indirect, and it is not the most important source of power for foreign policy in the short run.

However, ignoring or neglecting soft power is a strategic and analytic mistake. Soft power is not new. Roman power rested partly on the attraction of its culture. Geir Lundstadt, a Norwegian scholar, described Cold War Europe as divided into two empires, Soviet and American, but the American presence in Western Europe was “an empire by invitation.” Unlike the Soviet military interventions in Hungary and Czechoslovakia, the United States supported Western European integration and tolerated Charles De Gaulle’s independence. At the end of the Cold War, the Berlin Wall collapsed under an onslaught of hammers and bulldozers wielded by people in the Soviet empire whose minds had been affected by Western soft power.

Mao may have been right that power comes out of the barrel of a gun, but power also extends from values. In the short run, swords are mightier than words, but in the long run, words guide swords. If I can get you to want to do what I want, then I do not have to force you to do what you do not want. If a country represents values that others find attractive, it has less of a need for sticks and carrots. Hard and soft power sometimes contradict each other, but when they are smartly combined, attraction is a force multiplier. President Zelensky used his talents as an actor to attract sympathy from Western parliaments, which could then be transformed into budgets for weapons that increased Ukraine’s hard power.

Soft power is an integral part of the great power conflict between the United States and China. In 2007, President Hu Jintao told the 17th Congress of the Chinese Communist Party that China needed to increase its soft power, and the Chinese government spent tens of billions of dollars to that end, but international polls show mixed results.

As I describe in A Life in the American Century, the Chinese foreign minister once invited me to a private dinner to ask my opinion on how China could increase its soft power. My advice was correct but probably useless to him. China faces two major obstacles that are difficult to overcome. First is its territorial disputes with a number of its Asian neighbors. Confucius Institutes that extoll traditional Chinese culture do little good if the PLA is killing Indian troops in the Himalayas or Chinese ships are harassing Philippine boats in the South China Sea. China’s second problem is its tight Communist Party control over all organizations and opinions in its civil society. This undercuts its attractiveness in democratic countries. When human rights lawyers, writers, and artists are jailed, it reduces the attraction of China in countries like Europe, Australia, Japan, and the United States.

Unlike hard-power assets like soldiers, tanks, and planes, a nation’s soft-power reserves are generated by civil society rather than governments. Much of American soft power is created by Hollywood movies that feature, for example, independent female characters, protesters demonstrating for their rights, and the workings of a diverse and free press. Others are attracted by the charitable work of U.S. foundations and the freedom of inquiry at American universities. Firms, universities, foundations, churches, and protest movements each develop soft power of their own, which can reinforce foreigners’ views of the country.

A prominent European recently told me that he used to worry about American foreign policy in terms of a decline in our hard power. Now, he said that he was more worried about America’s domestic politics corroding the soft power that underlies its foreign policy. Soft power is only one side of the coin of power, but it remains relevant to any realist analysis of world politics.

Joseph S. Nye is a former assistant secretary of defense, Distinguished Service Professor, Emeritus at Harvard University, and author of A Life in the American Century (Polity Press, 2024).

Source: nationalinterest.org

Source link

You Might Also Like

Trump’s South Africa Standoff

Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine

Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground

Why a Stronger Yuan Could Be China’s Boldest Bet Yet

Trump’s Self-Sabotage Is Hurting the Dollar—and America’s Future

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article New Caledonia and the Geopolitics of Critical Metals: Towards a Disruption of the Nickel Market?
Next Article Between the EU and Moscow: How Russia Exploits Divisions in Bosnia Between the EU and Moscow: How Russia Exploits Divisions in Bosnia
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

SAFE Plan Puts Turkey’s EU Role Back in Spotlight
Europe Geopolitics Security
From Bibi to Business Zones: Trump’s Soft Power Mirage
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
From Ally to Afterthought: Netanyahu Faces Trump’s Cold Shoulder
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
Commentary Geopolitics

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?