By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    The Chinese Way to Peace: China’s Role in Peacebuilding and Peacekeeping in South Sudan
    April 13, 2025
    If London Is Calling, Is Brussels Answering? The Future of EU-UK Foreign and Security Cooperation
    April 13, 2025
    How the United States Can Effectively Pivot to Asia
    How the United States Can Effectively Pivot to Asia
    August 11, 2024
    Latest News
    The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall
    May 3, 2025
    China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets
    April 25, 2025
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Al-Sharaa: Syria Negotiating Future Military Presence with Russia and Turkey
    April 24, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    IAEA Raises Fresh Alarm on Global Nuclear Security Amid Rise in Radioactive Incidents
    March 2, 2025
    Turkey Successfully Tests Tayfun Ballistic Missile, Doubling Strike Range
    February 5, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall
    April 30, 2025
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Collapse of Turkish Soft Power: Cyprus Recognition by Turkic States Reflects Post-Gülenist Vacuum
    April 17, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    The West’s Pact with Power: How Erdoğan’s Autocracy Was Accepted and Normalized
    April 10, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: Semiconductors Are the Achilles Heel of AI Giants
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > Semiconductors Are the Achilles Heel of AI Giants
CommentaryGeopolitics

Semiconductors Are the Achilles Heel of AI Giants

Last updated: April 13, 2025 1:57 am
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published June 29, 2024 353 Views 10 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics: 

The article discusses the significant concentration of semiconductor design and production for AI applications, primarily controlled by Nvidia and manufactured by TSMC. This dominance poses challenges and envy among other tech giants due to dependency issues. Despite efforts from governments to support new entrants into the semiconductor market, catching up remains a long-term challenge. The article highlights the crucial role of dedicated AI processors in the tech ecosystem and the substantial investments required for their development and production. It also underscores geopolitical efforts to ensure technological sovereignty in semiconductor supply chains amidst global demand spikes and supply shortages.


The extreme concentration around Nvidia and TSMC in the design and production of semiconductors for AI raises concerns and sparks envy among Big Tech companies, which are highly dependent in this respect. Despite government support, catching up will remain a long-term challenge.

The explosion in artificial intelligence rests on two pillars of a different nature: on the one hand, the development of giant GPT-style large language models and, on the other, phenomenal computing power with dedicated processors. These are designed in particular by the ubiquitous giant Nvidia, and manufactured by a tight-knit handful of players, with Taiwan’s TSMC in particular. AI models and semiconductors require huge investments and cutting-edge skills. However, these two worlds cooperate closely, yet with very different requirements.

In terms of model development, US digital giants such as Microsoft, Meta and Google have all the technological, economic and political resources they need to dominate the sector, both internally and through takeovers and partnerships. This last aspect even enables them to harness the diversification seen with the explosion of open source, i.e. models that are freely distributed and reusable by all. Although open source enables an entire AI ecosystem to exist, it is hardly to be seen as a David versus Goliath situation, as the giants themselves are heavily invested in it. Meta’s LLaMa language models, for example, are open source. In addition, the financial clout of Big Tech is such that independent players are falling into its orbit one after the other. French start-up Mistral recently announced that it was joining Microsoft, entrusting it with the distribution of its most advanced model, which will therefore be closed. The giants thus have ample means to keep a firm grip on model development.

Behind this dominance, the importance of the processors that enable the formation of these AI models should not be underestimated. In fact, they are the lifeblood of today’s technological war, and are in the hands of industrial giants of a different kind. The entire AI scene remains ultra-dependent on an incredibly concentrated chain of semiconductor design and production, centered around Nvidia and TSMC.

A booming demand for AI-dedicated semiconductors, and very few suppliers

For Big Tech, self-sufficiency in semiconductors remains a challenge difficult to tackle. After decades of investment, Nvidia has a virtual monopoly on the design of AI-dedicated semiconductors. Last year, the US company designed 80% of this type of semiconductors worldwide.

Once they have been designed, Nvidia subcontracts their manufacture to Taiwan’s TSMC, one of only ten companies capable of producing them worldwide. Nvidia is said to be « fabless ». In this industry, the manufacture of a semiconductor requires a production line with its own characteristics (manufacturing equipment, testing and packaging). These new production lines are extremely expensive. A brand-new plant (or foundry in industry terminology) requires between $15 and $20 billion and a minimum of two years to build. Very few economic players are able to invest these staggering sums and overcome the entry barrier to the foundry market (« Fabs »).

Governments embrace the issue in the name of technological sovereignty

Despite the enormity of the investments involved, some players are entering or re-entering this market, such as Intel and Japan’s Rapidus. Manufacturers already in the race, such as TSMC and South Korea’s Samsung, are continuing to invest in order to maintain their market share. Following the end of covid-19 and a shortage of semiconductors, some governments decided to boost their financial support for the sector. « Chip Acts » were introduced to increase national semiconductor manufacturing capacity, strengthen economic security and guarantee supplies for military use, even in the event of a crisis. These include the United States, with the Chips and Science Act ($39 billion in 2022), the European Union, with the Chip Act ($43 billion in 2023), Japan, with the creation of the Rapidus conglomerate and a support plan ($100 billion for Rapidus and the new TSMC plants over 2023-2027), China, with the launch in 2023 of phase 3 of the Chinese government’s semiconductor guarantee fund ($46 billion for the 2023-2027 period), and South Korea, with a $7.3 billion government plan. In the US, the knock-on effect of public subsidies in the sector is notable. The $39 billion Chips and Science Act encouraged a $200 billion wave of private investment by American and foreign companies on American soil.

New entrants and a new scale of funding

Until new factories produce more chips, supply will be unable to keep pace with global demand for AI chips. Hence a significant rise in prices. A GPU from Nvidia (H100) can cost up to $40,000 a unit. Its availability is limited because, even with increased production volume, the company is still not meeting market needs. Some users and buyers of Nvidia chips are concerned about dependence on a single supplier. This is the case of Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, as the lack of dedicated AI chips is likely to hamper the development of his own company. Why not try to create his own industrial resources to correct this supply-demand imbalance? This is the logic of any new entrant in a fast-growing sector. Sam Altman has been meeting with manufacturers and investment funds for several months. In his first estimates, he mentioned an (extravagant) $7,000 billion investment drive to build a new chapter in the semiconductor industry. The project is still underway. And Altman is not alone. Initiatives are flourishing. Apple is working with TSMC to manufacture AI chips. Masasyoshi Son, head of the Japanese group SoftBank, wants to transform his group into an AI powerhouse. His latest project is to enable his ARM subsidiary to create a new AI chip division. A prototype will be tested in spring 2025, and mass production should start in autumn 2025. For its part, Nvidia is maintaining its technological lead in an accelerating market. According to Precedence Research of Canada, the global market is set to reach $100 billion in 2029 and $200 billion in 2032.

This scarcity of a new kind is prompting digital giants to enter the market, but in different ways. In the face of these ambitions, Nvidia continues tirelessly to position itself to keep improving, and in particular to outperform what the giants are likely to be able to do when it comes to designing processors dedicated to AI. Digital giants find themselves caught in an industrial stranglehold that will be difficult to overcome. The horizon of balanced global competition, in which all the major economic zones would secure supply and some level of sovereignty remains even more distant and uncertain. The ultra-concentration of semiconductors dedicated to AI points to a very real risk of industrial resilience for the entire chain, right through to end-users. In this respect, diversification is a major political challenge.

By Rémi Bourgeot, economist and engineer, Associate Research Fellow at IRIS, and Estelle Prin, Founder of the Semiconductors Observatory

Find out more about the Observatoire des semi-conducteurs.

Source: French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs (IRIS)

Source link

You Might Also Like

The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall

China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets

The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age

Al-Sharaa: Syria Negotiating Future Military Presence with Russia and Turkey

Egypt Hosts China for Landmark Air Drills, Signaling Strategic Shift Amid U.S. Tensions

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article What Will Become of the CFSP in the Wake of the Radical Right Rise?
Next Article Minister for Development Cooperation and Metropolitan Policy Caroline Gennez (L) visits a solar power project during a visit to the packaging unit Can EU Enlargement Work?
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Iraq Reclaims Strategic Spotlight as Regional Trade Routes Bypass Strait of Hormuz
Economy Energy Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Collapse of Turkish Soft Power: Cyprus Recognition by Turkic States Reflects Post-Gülenist Vacuum
Commentary Eurasia Geopolitics
Offshore Pact, Mineral Finds Signal New Era for Pakistan
Economy Energy Geopolitics
Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
Defence Technology Geopolitics

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?