By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    August 6, 2025
    The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making
    August 6, 2025
    China Showcases Yu-10 Torpedo’s Destructive Power in Submarine Force Anniversary Drill
    August 11, 2024
    Latest News
    The Gülen Diaspora and the Return of a Calvinist Moment in Islam
    February 3, 2026
    Broad Buy-In, Rival Readings, Future Risks: SDF and Damascus Clash Over Integration Terms
    January 31, 2026
    İbrahim Kalın: Erdoğan’s Most Geopolitically Credible Successor
    January 30, 2026
    Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal
    January 26, 2026
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies
    December 26, 2025
    Ahmed al-Ahmed: The Hero Islamophobes and Anti-Immigrant Voices Did Not Expect
    December 15, 2025
    Five Turkish defense firms enter SIPRI Top 100 with record $10.1 billion in 2024 sales
    December 1, 2025
    Turkey’s Kızılelma drone fires radar-guided missile in beyond-visual-range test
    December 1, 2025
    More Than Mischief: How a Weakened Moscow Seeks to Dismantle NATO from Within
    September 21, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    The Gülen Diaspora and the Return of a Calvinist Moment in Islam
    February 3, 2026
    Broad Buy-In, Rival Readings, Future Risks: SDF and Damascus Clash Over Integration Terms
    January 31, 2026
    İbrahim Kalın: Erdoğan’s Most Geopolitically Credible Successor
    January 30, 2026
    Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal
    January 26, 2026
    Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF
    January 24, 2026
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: How much power do China’s sovereign funds hold?
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > How much power do China’s sovereign funds hold?
CommentaryGeopolitics

How much power do China’s sovereign funds hold?

Last updated: August 11, 2024 5:18 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published July 21, 2024 875 Views 5 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Zongyuan Zoe Liu’s book – Sovereign Funds: How the Communist Party of China Finances Its Global Ambitions- explores the role of China’s sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) in supporting the Communist Party of China’s (CCP) global ambitions. It delves into how these funds, which manage over $2 trillion, are used to bolster China’s economy and extend its financial influence worldwide.

Contents
Key PointsCriticisms and ObservationsConclusion

Key Points

  1. Origins and Objectives of China’s SWFs:

    • Formation and Purpose: The creation of China’s SWFs was driven by a desire to manage the massive reserves accumulated from trade surpluses rather than investing them in low-yielding U.S. Treasury bonds. The China Investment Corporation (CIC) was established in 2007 with a focus on overseas investments, while the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) manages another significant portion of China’s financial assets.
    • Initial Investments: The early focus was on commercial investments rather than geopolitical strategies. The funds aimed to stabilize China’s financial markets and manage risks associated with their vast reserves.
  2. Domestic Impact:

    • Financial Stability: Chinese SWFs have played a critical role in stabilizing the domestic economy, especially during financial crises. For instance, Central Huijin Investment, a part of CIC, intervened multiple times to support Chinese stock exchanges and state-owned banks.
    • Investment in Key Sectors: SWFs have invested heavily in Chinese technology firms like Alibaba and Didi Chuxing, aligning with China’s strategic goals to advance in high-tech industries.
  3. International Strategy and Influence:

    • Global Investments: Liu examines how China’s SWFs have targeted investments in global markets, including stakes in Western financial institutions and energy companies. These investments are intended to increase China’s influence and secure strategic assets.
    • Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): A significant portion of SWF investments has been directed toward the BRI, funding infrastructure projects in various countries to bolster economic ties and expand China’s global influence.
  4. Challenges and Failures:

    • Investment Missteps: The book details several poor investment decisions, such as those made during the global financial crisis. Investments in firms like Morgan Stanley and Blackstone, as well as Canadian energy companies, faced significant losses.
    • Political Backlash: Efforts to use SWFs for political leverage have often backfired. For example, attempts to influence Costa Rica’s diplomatic policies led to negative publicity and diplomatic fallout.
  5. Political and Economic Risks:

    • Geopolitical Tensions: Chinese SWFs have faced scrutiny and resistance in Western countries, where investments are often viewed with suspicion due to concerns about national security and economic influence.
    • Vulnerabilities: Investments abroad expose China to geopolitical risks, such as the freezing of assets in response to political conflicts, as demonstrated by the international reaction to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
  6. Comparative Analysis:

    • Comparison with Other SWFs: Liu contrasts China’s approach with other countries’ SWFs, noting that while China’s funds have been used to advance national strategic interests, they also face significant challenges and criticisms. For instance, Norway’s SWF focuses more on domestic social safety nets, which contrasts with China’s more geopolitical approach.

Criticisms and Observations

  • Alarmism vs. Reality: Liu’s portrayal of China’s SWFs as a major tool for advancing global ambitions may sometimes seem alarmist. While these funds do play a role in supporting China’s global strategies, their effectiveness and impact are mixed and subject to significant challenges.
  • Involvement of Western Capitalists: Liu highlights the relationship between Chinese officials and Western financial leaders, noting that while this relationship might have bolstered certain individuals in the West, it hasn’t always translated into substantial benefits for China.

Conclusion

Liu’s book provides an insightful examination of how China’s SWFs contribute to its global financial strategy. While these funds are indeed instrumental in supporting China’s domestic economy and international ambitions, they also face considerable risks and challenges. The book serves as a crucial resource for understanding the complex role of sovereign wealth funds in modern geopolitics.


 ­­

 

You Might Also Like

The Gülen Diaspora and the Return of a Calvinist Moment in Islam

Broad Buy-In, Rival Readings, Future Risks: SDF and Damascus Clash Over Integration Terms

İbrahim Kalın: Erdoğan’s Most Geopolitically Credible Successor

Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal

Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Venezuela’s Strongman Could Actually Lose Venezuela’s Strongman Maduro Could Actually Lose
Next Article Europe must enhance its geopolitical strategy
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

The Day After the SDF: Turkey’s Salafism Gamble—and Bilal Erdoğan’s Succession Pipeline
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Salafi Consolidation: Is Iraq—and the KRG—Next After Syria and Yemen?
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?
Commentary Geopolitics
This Week’s Global Fault Lines: Venezuela, Greenland, and the New Coercion (Jan 01–07, 2026)
Geopolitics

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed + Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?