By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    The Chinese Way to Peace: China’s Role in Peacebuilding and Peacekeeping in South Sudan
    April 13, 2025
    If London Is Calling, Is Brussels Answering? The Future of EU-UK Foreign and Security Cooperation
    April 13, 2025
    How the United States Can Effectively Pivot to Asia
    How the United States Can Effectively Pivot to Asia
    August 11, 2024
    Latest News
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
    Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise
    May 11, 2025
    Not Bismarck, but Bonaparte: Trump’s Foreign Policy and the Risks of Great-Power Collusion
    May 11, 2025
    U.S.–Israel Rift Widens: Trump Cuts Off Netanyahu as Senior Official Warns of ‘Heavy Price’ Over Gaza Stalemate
    May 11, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    IAEA Raises Fresh Alarm on Global Nuclear Security Amid Rise in Radioactive Incidents
    March 2, 2025
    Turkey Successfully Tests Tayfun Ballistic Missile, Doubling Strike Range
    February 5, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
    Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise
    May 11, 2025
    Not Bismarck, but Bonaparte: Trump’s Foreign Policy and the Risks of Great-Power Collusion
    May 11, 2025
    The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall
    April 30, 2025
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: Germany’s Dilemma: Hosting U.S. Cluster Munitions While Advocating for a Ban
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > Germany’s Dilemma: Hosting U.S. Cluster Munitions While Advocating for a Ban
CommentaryGeopolitics

Germany’s Dilemma: Hosting U.S. Cluster Munitions While Advocating for a Ban

Last updated: August 11, 2024 4:57 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published July 30, 2024 250 Views 9 Min Read
Share
SHARE
Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

The article highlights a contradiction in Germany’s stance on cluster munitions. Germany has traditionally supported the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions, which bans these weapons due to their severe risks to civilians. Despite this, new evidence suggests that Germany may be indirectly facilitating the transfer of U.S. cluster munitions to Ukraine.

Cluster munitions are designed to disperse submunitions over wide areas, many of which fail to detonate and pose long-term dangers, similar to landmines. Since July 2023, the U.S. has approved multiple transfers of cluster munitions to Ukraine, despite the fact that neither Ukraine nor Russia is a party to the convention banning these weapons. Germany, a signatory to the convention, has publicly opposed sending such munitions to Ukraine but is reportedly hosting U.S. stocks of these munitions on its territory and may be facilitating their transit.

The U.S. Department of Defense has not confirmed specifics about the transfer of these munitions but has stated that their movement adheres to international agreements and U.S. regulations. Germany’s hosting of U.S. cluster munitions on its bases does not fall under its jurisdiction due to the Status of Forces Agreement with the U.S.

Given Germany’s prominent role in the convention and its previous efforts to eliminate its own cluster munitions stockpile, this situation raises concerns about its commitment to the treaty. The article calls for President Biden to halt the transfer of cluster munitions and for Germany to demand the removal of such stocks from its territory and to prevent their transit. It urges all convention parties to uphold the ban on these dangerous weapons.

Read more below.


Report: US sending cluster munitions to Ukraine via Germany

Germany has publicly opposed the transfer of banned cluster munitions, but new evidence indicates it may be facilitating it. That stand is at odds with its longstanding support for the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions banning these weapons.

Cluster munitions are delivered from aircraft or fired in rockets, missiles, and artillery projectiles. They open in the air to disperse multiple submunitions over a wide area and many fail to detonate as designed and pose a long-lasting danger, like landmines.

Repeated Russian cluster munition attacks have killed and injured hundreds of Ukrainian civilians since 2022, while Ukrainian forces have also used cluster munitions, resulting in civilian casualties. Since July 2023, U.S. President Joseph Biden has approved five transfers to Ukraine of U.S. cluster munitions delivered by 155mm artillery projectiles and by ballistic missiles.

Russia, Ukraine, and the United States have not joined the cluster munitions treaty, which prohibits the weapons. However, 112 countries, including Germany, have ratified the treaty because of the foreseeable harm caused to civilians. At least 35 countries party to the convention regard the transit and foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions as prohibited by the convention.

When the U.S. transfers were first announced, more than two dozen world leaders expressed concern. German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said that as a member of the Convention on Cluster Munitions, Germany “opposes sending cluster munitions to Ukraine.”

That principled stand has been brought into question following a documentary by Germany media outlet ARD’s “Panorama” program, which aired July 25. A spokesperson for the U.S. Army for Europe and Africa confirmed in writing to ARD that U.S. 155mm M864 and M483A1 cluster munition artillery projectiles are stored at the U.S. Army’s ammunition storage depot in Miesau in Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany. From there, ARD reported, they have been shipped to Ukraine as part of U.S. military assistance, transiting across Germany and Poland in the process.

When asked to comment on the ARD report, a Defense Department spokesperson, Charlie Dietz, told Responsible Statecraft that “it is general U.S. policy to not discuss specific details of military logistics or the movement of munitions for security reasons.” He did not deny that U.S. cluster munitions held at the U.S. base in Germany have been transferred to Ukraine and said, “the movement of munitions and all other items by the U.S. military is done in accordance with U.S. obligations under applicable international agreements, U.S. law, and DoD regulations, including safety standards.”

Germany’s “Status of Forces Agreement” with the U.S. stipulates how Germany hosts U.S. troops on its territory. There is little transparency surrounding the agreement, but it appears to be permissive when it comes to cluster munitions. This is because U.S. stocks of cluster munitions held on American military bases in Germany are not regarded under the agreement to be under German jurisdiction and control.

Germany’s defense minister and other officials told ARD that they could not confirm the presence of U.S. cluster munitions on military bases in Germany and had no knowledge about whether U.S. cluster munitions have passed through German territory or its airspace. But the U.S. Army spokesperson told ARD that German armed forces receive “documentation of the contents of the shipments” of munitions sent from the U.S. base at Miesau.

This news is dismaying given Germany’s exemplary leadership role in the convention. Germany was among the first 30 ratifications to trigger the convention’s entry into force on August 1, 2010. It hosted a major international conference on the destruction of cluster munitions stocks in Berlin in 2009 and completed the destruction of its cluster munition stockpile in 2015. Germany served as president of the convention in 2017.

In contrast, the United States did not participate, even as an observer, in the 2007–2008 Oslo Process that created the convention. However, U.S. Department of State cables made public by Wikileaks show that Washington attempted to influence its allies, partners, and other states during the process to affect the outcome of the negotiations, especially with respect to the issue of “interoperability” – joint military operations between the U.S. and states parties to the convention.

The U.S. withdrew its cluster munition stocks from its bases in Norway and the United Kingdom in 2010, but the cables released by Wikileaks showed it may still stockpile cluster munitions in states parties such as Germany, Italy, and Spain. The U.S. government has not responded to repeated calls from civil society groups to provide details on the specific types, quantities, and dud rates of the cluster munitions transferred to Ukraine or on the transit points and anticipated end date for the transfers.

President Biden should immediately halt the transfer of cluster munitions given the significant short-term and long-term humanitarian and human rights risks to civilians. Washington should take steps to accede to the Convention on Cluster Munitions without delay.

Meanwhile, Germany should tell the United States to remove its stocks of cluster munitions without delay. It should be clear in opposing any transit of cluster munitions across its territory, airspace, or waters.

All countries that are party to the convention should call for ending the transit and foreign stockpiling of cluster munitions. They should not intentionally or deliberately assist, induce, or encourage any activity prohibited under the Convention on Cluster Munitions.

By: Mary Wareham

Source: responsiblestatecraft.org

You Might Also Like

How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs

Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise

Not Bismarck, but Bonaparte: Trump’s Foreign Policy and the Risks of Great-Power Collusion

U.S.–Israel Rift Widens: Trump Cuts Off Netanyahu as Senior Official Warns of ‘Heavy Price’ Over Gaza Stalemate

The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article What Can a Lame-Duck President Accomplish Now?
Next Article US needs to double down on directed energy weapons Directed Energy Weapons: The U.S. Strategic Shift Needed to Combat the Drone and Missile Threat
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets
Geopolitics Southeast Asia
The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
Commentary Geopolitics Security
Al-Sharaa: Syria Negotiating Future Military Presence with Russia and Turkey
Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Egypt Hosts China for Landmark Air Drills, Signaling Strategic Shift Amid U.S. Tensions
Geopolitics Middle East & Africa

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?