By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    August 6, 2025
    The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making
    August 6, 2025
    The Coldest Geopolitical Hotspot: Global Powers Vie for Arctic Dominance over Greenland
    Greenland in the Crosshairs: Global Powers Compete for Arctic Dominance
    August 29, 2024
    Latest News
    The Gülen Diaspora and the Return of a Calvinist Moment in Islam
    February 3, 2026
    Broad Buy-In, Rival Readings, Future Risks: SDF and Damascus Clash Over Integration Terms
    January 31, 2026
    İbrahim Kalın: Erdoğan’s Most Geopolitically Credible Successor
    January 30, 2026
    Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal
    January 26, 2026
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies
    December 26, 2025
    Ahmed al-Ahmed: The Hero Islamophobes and Anti-Immigrant Voices Did Not Expect
    December 15, 2025
    Five Turkish defense firms enter SIPRI Top 100 with record $10.1 billion in 2024 sales
    December 1, 2025
    Turkey’s Kızılelma drone fires radar-guided missile in beyond-visual-range test
    December 1, 2025
    More Than Mischief: How a Weakened Moscow Seeks to Dismantle NATO from Within
    September 21, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    The Gülen Diaspora and the Return of a Calvinist Moment in Islam
    February 3, 2026
    Broad Buy-In, Rival Readings, Future Risks: SDF and Damascus Clash Over Integration Terms
    January 31, 2026
    İbrahim Kalın: Erdoğan’s Most Geopolitically Credible Successor
    January 30, 2026
    Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal
    January 26, 2026
    Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF
    January 24, 2026
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Geopolitical Clashes and Strategic Calculations in the South China Sea
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Regions > Southeast Asia > Geopolitical Clashes and Strategic Calculations in the South China Sea
CommentaryGeopoliticsSoutheast Asia

Geopolitical Clashes and Strategic Calculations in the South China Sea

Last updated: November 10, 2024 6:48 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published November 10, 2024 746 Views 3 Min Read
Share
SHARE



Summary and Additional Remarks by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

Under the watchful eye of the United States, the South China Sea has emerged as a focal point of geopolitical conflict as China’s forceful measures collide with the Philippines’ attempts to maintain its sovereignty. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations’ (ASEAN) difficulties in taking a united stand further exacerbate this complex scenario.

China’s Strategic Approach

China has stepped up its actions in the South China Sea, using “grey zone” strategies to bolster its claims without resorting to open warfare, such as using coast guard ships and marine militia. By progressively gaining authority over contested regions, this tactic seeks to make them de facto Chinese possessions. Such actions put the resolve of surrounding countries and the larger international community to the test in addition to violating international maritime norms.

The Philippines’ Response


Active resistance has replaced appeasement as the Philippines’ policy under President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. Through cooperative exercises and improved defence alliances with the US, Australia, and Japan, Manila has bolstered its military capabilities and publicly denounced China’s actions in international fora. A strategic choice to balance China’s influence and safeguard national interests is reflected in this proactive approach.

ASEAN’s Role and Challenges

ASEAN has faced difficulties in formulating a cohesive policy regarding the South China Sea disputes. Prolonged negotiations over a Code of Conduct have yet to yield a binding agreement, highlighting the organization’s struggle to mediate effectively amid the competing interests of its member states and external pressures. This impasse raises concerns about ASEAN’s capacity to maintain regional stability and uphold international norms

Broader Implications

The South China Sea’s growing tensions are a microcosm of global geopolitical rivalry that goes beyond local conflicts. The Philippines’ and other countries’ reactions highlight the difficulties in preserving regional peace and sovereignty, while China’s actions call into question the current international order. The scenario evaluates the efficacy of multilateral diplomacy and the dedication of the international community to maintaining the rule of law in maritime conflicts.

In conclusion, the South China Sea stands as a pivotal domain where national interests, regional stability, and global power dynamics converge. The actions and strategies of the involved parties will significantly influence the future geopolitical landscape of the Indo-Pacific region.

Read more here.

You Might Also Like

The Gülen Diaspora and the Return of a Calvinist Moment in Islam

Broad Buy-In, Rival Readings, Future Risks: SDF and Damascus Clash Over Integration Terms

İbrahim Kalın: Erdoğan’s Most Geopolitically Credible Successor

Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal

Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Putin’s Strategic Gambit: Russia’s Expanding Influence Amid Western Distraction
Next Article Competing Currents: How U.S. Strategy is Losing Ground in the Arctic
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

The Day After the SDF: Turkey’s Salafism Gamble—and Bilal Erdoğan’s Succession Pipeline
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Salafi Consolidation: Is Iraq—and the KRG—Next After Syria and Yemen?
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?
Commentary Geopolitics
This Week’s Global Fault Lines: Venezuela, Greenland, and the New Coercion (Jan 01–07, 2026)
Geopolitics

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed + Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?