By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    Addressing the lack of funding for climate change initiatives in areas affected by violent conflicts.
    April 13, 2025
    Supply Chain Risks in EU-South Korea Relations: Semiconductor Industries
    April 13, 2025
    Biden’s mixed messages to Israel are coming home to roost
    August 11, 2024
    Latest News
    Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
    May 13, 2025
    America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying
    May 13, 2025
    From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label
    May 13, 2025
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    IAEA Raises Fresh Alarm on Global Nuclear Security Amid Rise in Radioactive Incidents
    March 2, 2025
    Turkey Successfully Tests Tayfun Ballistic Missile, Doubling Strike Range
    February 5, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
    May 13, 2025
    America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying
    May 13, 2025
    From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label
    May 13, 2025
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
    Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise
    May 11, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: Beyond the Controversy: Why Cluster Munitions Are Key to Ukraine’s Defense
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Regions > Eurasia > Beyond the Controversy: Why Cluster Munitions Are Key to Ukraine’s Defense
CommentaryEurasiaGeopoliticsWar

Beyond the Controversy: Why Cluster Munitions Are Key to Ukraine’s Defense

Last updated: October 6, 2024 3:44 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published October 6, 2024 2.2k Views 5 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary and Additional Remarks by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

Contents
Timeline of Cluster Munitions Use:Effectiveness and Impact:Political Controversy and NATO’s Stance:Broader Implications for NATO:

The article explores how Ukraine’s use of cluster munitions has evolved since the Russian invasion, beginning with limited supplies from Turkey and gradually incorporating U.S.-provided cluster rounds for artillery and HIMARS rockets. The recent approval of AGM-154 precision glide bombs completes Ukraine’s arsenal of cluster weapons, enabling strikes at various ranges—from artillery’s 20 km to aircraft-deployed bombs reaching 100 km. This multi-layered deployment has led to a dramatic increase in Russian casualties, especially in counter-battery operations, and has intensified the debate on NATO’s stance on cluster munitions.

Timeline of Cluster Munitions Use:

  1. Initial Restrictions: When Ukraine first received Western military support, it was limited to high-explosive (HE) artillery shells and rockets, which were less effective against Russian forces. Turkey’s decision to send 155mm Dual-Purpose Improved Conventional Munitions (DPICM) in late 2022 marked the first significant introduction of cluster munitions, enhancing Ukraine’s ability to target Russian troops and artillery.
  2. Turkey’s Early Impact: The initial batch of 3,500 DPICM rounds had a disproportionate impact, greatly increasing Russian casualties. This success prompted Turkey to increase the supply to 3,500 rounds per month. These weapons proved especially effective for counter-battery fire—allowing Ukrainian forces to more accurately strike and neutralize Russian artillery positions.
  3. Gradual U.S. Involvement: In July 2023, the United States began providing 155mm DPICM rounds, further boosting Ukraine’s capabilities. In October 2023, the U.S. expanded this support to include HIMARS cluster rockets and ATACMS missiles, which were instrumental in some of Ukraine’s most significant attacks. For example, the ATACMS strike on Russian airfields in Crimea destroyed 24 attack helicopters, marking one of Russia’s largest air losses since World War II.
  4. The Addition of Air-Delivered Cluster Munitions: The approval of AGM-154 precision cluster bombs for Ukraine’s air force completes the range of cluster munitions available. These 100km-range bombs can be launched from aircraft deep into Russian territory, significantly extending Ukraine’s strike capabilities. Each type of cluster munition—whether artillery, rocket, or air-delivered—serves a unique tactical purpose, allowing for layered defense and offense.

Effectiveness and Impact:

The effectiveness of cluster munitions is visible in Russia’s casualty rates, which surged to over 35,000 casualties per month starting in May 2024. Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense estimates over 150,000 Russian dead or wounded in the past five months alone, with over 1,400 artillery pieces destroyed monthly. The introduction of these munitions has shifted the battlefield dynamics, demonstrating their tactical value despite ongoing political concerns.

Political Controversy and NATO’s Stance:

The use of cluster munitions remains contentious due to the unexploded ordnance they leave behind, which poses risks to civilians long after conflicts end. The Cluster Munitions Convention (CMC), signed by several NATO members, prohibits the use of such weapons. The article argues that the success of these munitions in Ukraine should prompt NATO members to reconsider their stance. It specifically calls on countries like Norway to follow Lithuania’s example and withdraw from the CMC, arguing that effective deterrence against Russia requires embracing such capabilities.

Broader Implications for NATO:

General David Petraeus is quoted advocating for NATO to re-evaluate its policies, suggesting that the Ukraine conflict has shattered post-Cold War assumptions about the utility of cluster munitions. With the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine highlighting the effectiveness of these weapons, the article asserts that NATO should support their use to enhance defense and deterrence capabilities across Europe’s eastern flank.

The piece ultimately calls for a paradigm shift, urging Western powers to provide Ukraine with all available cluster munitions in large quantities, arguing that doing so is essential to achieving victory and deterring future conflicts.

Read more here.

You Might Also Like

Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together

America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying

From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label

How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs

Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article The Fallout of Niger’s Coup: Rethinking Western Strategies in the Sahel
Next Article A Misguided Focus: Why ‘Near-Peer’ Threats Miss the Strategic Mark
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Not Bismarck, but Bonaparte: Trump’s Foreign Policy and the Risks of Great-Power Collusion
Commentary Geopolitics
U.S.–Israel Rift Widens: Trump Cuts Off Netanyahu as Senior Official Warns of ‘Heavy Price’ Over Gaza Stalemate
Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets
Geopolitics Southeast Asia

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?