By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    August 6, 2025
    The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making
    August 6, 2025
    Roadblocks and revenues: The politics of passage
    April 13, 2025
    Latest News
    Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?
    January 12, 2026
    This Week’s Global Fault Lines: Venezuela, Greenland, and the New Coercion (Jan 01–07, 2026)
    January 8, 2026
    Global Fault Lines: Weekly Developments Across Key Geopolitical Theaters (Dec 22–28, 2025)
    December 29, 2025
    Gaza, Not Ankara: The Real Motive Behind Israel’s Somaliland Recognition
    December 27, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies
    December 26, 2025
    Ahmed al-Ahmed: The Hero Islamophobes and Anti-Immigrant Voices Did Not Expect
    December 15, 2025
    Five Turkish defense firms enter SIPRI Top 100 with record $10.1 billion in 2024 sales
    December 1, 2025
    Turkey’s Kızılelma drone fires radar-guided missile in beyond-visual-range test
    December 1, 2025
    More Than Mischief: How a Weakened Moscow Seeks to Dismantle NATO from Within
    September 21, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?
    January 12, 2026
    Gaza, Not Ankara: The Real Motive Behind Israel’s Somaliland Recognition
    December 27, 2025
    Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies
    December 26, 2025
    Ahmed al-Ahmed: The Hero Islamophobes and Anti-Immigrant Voices Did Not Expect
    December 15, 2025
    TUAF543: Accident at FL240—or a Message to Ankara?
    November 12, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: Balancing Influence: China’s Multilateral Approach Through BRICS and Beyond
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > Balancing Influence: China’s Multilateral Approach Through BRICS and Beyond
CommentaryGeopolitics

Balancing Influence: China’s Multilateral Approach Through BRICS and Beyond

Last updated: November 19, 2024 7:58 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published November 19, 2024 760 Views 3 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

The article elaborates on China’s engagement with BRICS and how the recent summit in Kazan reflects its broader strategic ambitions. China is advocating for expanding BRICS membership and enhancing economic cooperation, including initiatives like artificial intelligence collaborations and a customs community portal. President Xi highlighted China’s vision for the Global South and the need for a more multipolar international system. However, China’s support for BRICS is not exclusive; it continues to engage with other institutions like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and the Belt and Road Initiative, focusing on diverse areas to maximize influence.

The Kazan summit, held in Russia, also highlighted different dynamics between BRICS members. Russian President Putin used the summit to emphasize his standing in the international community amid Western sanctions and isolation following the Ukraine conflict. However, the group’s response to Moscow’s position on Ukraine remained cautious, with many members avoiding direct support.

China, on the other hand, used the summit to launch initiatives aimed at strengthening the BRICS economic framework. Xi Jinping’s focus was on initiatives that align with China’s strategic goals, such as promoting global partnerships in technology and customs systems, reflecting Beijing’s ambition to shift global governance toward the interests of the Global South. Xi also advocated for expanding BRICS membership further, a stance aligned with Russia but viewed with skepticism by countries like Brazil and India.

Despite its enthusiasm for BRICS, China’s broader international strategy includes involvement in multiple institutions, allowing it to pursue its interests through various channels. For example, China is heavily involved in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), especially to address transnational issues in Central Asia, which are strategically important for western China’s security and development. Beijing also promotes the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation and the Belt and Road Initiative as complementary to BRICS, targeting different regional and thematic areas.

This multilateral engagement allows China to maintain influence across different global platforms and align its interests in diverse regions, reducing reliance on any single institution. Beijing’s diverse approach also helps mitigate the risk of a Cold War-like confrontation, as it avoids relying solely on the Sino-Russian partnership, which could lead to polarizing global blocs. Instead, China promotes a vision of multipolar global governance that emphasizes the role of rising powers in reshaping international norms and systems.

Read more here.

You Might Also Like

Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?

This Week’s Global Fault Lines: Venezuela, Greenland, and the New Coercion (Jan 01–07, 2026)

Global Fault Lines: Weekly Developments Across Key Geopolitical Theaters (Dec 22–28, 2025)

Gaza, Not Ankara: The Real Motive Behind Israel’s Somaliland Recognition

Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Trump’s Return: What It Means for Saudi-U.S. Relations in 2025
Next Article Cyprus NATO Membership: A Second Chance for Peace and Stability
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Ahmed al-Ahmed: The Hero Islamophobes and Anti-Immigrant Voices Did Not Expect
Commentary Geopolitics Human Rights Terrorism
Eight Muslim States Warn Israel Against ‘Exit-Only’ Rafah Plan
Geopolitics Human Rights Middle East & Africa
Five Turkish defense firms enter SIPRI Top 100 with record $10.1 billion in 2024 sales
Defence Technology Geopolitics
Turkey’s Kızılelma drone fires radar-guided missile in beyond-visual-range test
Defence Technology Geopolitics

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed + Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?