By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    China, Russia and the future of peacebuilding
    China, Russia and the future of peacebuilding
    April 13, 2025
    Gaza: a Humanitarian Emergency
    April 13, 2025
    Think China can already take Taiwan easily? Think again
    August 12, 2024
    Latest News
    Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
    May 13, 2025
    America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying
    May 13, 2025
    From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label
    May 13, 2025
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    IAEA Raises Fresh Alarm on Global Nuclear Security Amid Rise in Radioactive Incidents
    March 2, 2025
    Turkey Successfully Tests Tayfun Ballistic Missile, Doubling Strike Range
    February 5, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
    May 13, 2025
    America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying
    May 13, 2025
    From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label
    May 13, 2025
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
    Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise
    May 11, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: China’s Shift from Deng Xiaoping’s Pragmatism to Ideological Focus: A Cause for Concern
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > China’s Shift from Deng Xiaoping’s Pragmatism to Ideological Focus: A Cause for Concern
CommentaryGeopolitics

China’s Shift from Deng Xiaoping’s Pragmatism to Ideological Focus: A Cause for Concern

Last updated: September 2, 2024 3:08 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published September 2, 2024 2.1k Views 9 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary  by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

The article considers Deng Xiaoping’s significant influence on China’s emergence as a global economic power and assesses the potential for current policies to veer from his principles. Deng, who helped shape modern China by fighting for economic reforms and allowing the country’s admission into the global market, is recalled as policies shifted toward national security and ideology, potentially diverging from his pragmatic approach. This transition appears to be affecting China’s international relations as well as its internal economic interests, prompting debate over whether the present leadership is following or straying from Deng’s vision.

Deng Xiaoping would undoubtedly be concerned about China’s current direction, notably the shift from his concentration on economic development to an ideology-driven approach that prioritizes national security. Deng’s pragmatism and guiding idea of “seeking truth from facts” have been neglected as China’s leadership has become more concerned with international aggression and ideological conflicts. This shift has the potential to stymie China’s modernization efforts, which Deng favoured during his term, as well as alienate foreign partners.

Read the full article below.


If Deng Xiaoping were alive, he would worry about China’s shifting priorities
What would Deng Xiaoping think of China if he were alive today? That question has lingered in my mind ever since I joined tens of millions of Chinese on August 22 in marking his 120th birth anniversary.

The question is as relevant and important as it is sentimental and rhetorical.

Now that China is at a crossroads again, amid widespread concerns over the direction of the country and the state of its economy, remembering Deng has taken on a special significance.

Deng, who died in 1997 at the age of 92, would have been heartened but unsurprised to see that China’s economy has become the world’s second largest, as the country’s successive leaders vowed to carry the torch and honour his legacy.

On August 22, Chinese President Xi Jinping led senior officials in an elaborate ceremony to pay tribute to Deng and lavish praise on the chief architect of China’s reform and opening up, also a great internationalist who made major contributions to world peace and development. They vowed that they would continue to advance the cause Deng initiated and apply his theory to real-world problems.

But he would have been dismayed to find that some key tenets of his theory had already been discarded and forgotten.

A large screen in Beijing shows President Xi Jinping making a speech at an event marking the 120th anniversary of the birth of late leader Deng Xiaoping, on August 22. Photo: Kyodo

Acutely wary of the devastating consequences of Mao Zedong’s ultranationalist policies, including class struggle, Deng came up with the phrase bu zheng lun, or “let’s dispense with theoretical debate”, putting paid to the constant debate over socialism vs capitalism, the use of Western technology or the development of the private economy – so as to focus the Community Party’s attention on actually growing the economy.

Following the bloody crackdown on student demonstrations in 1989, China was at a crossroads again, with resurgent ultra-leftist sentiment threatening to derail Deng’s policy of reform and opening up in the name of national security and guarding against Western influence.

Deng then launched the legendary “southern tour” of 1992, when he repeatedly said that pursuing economic development should remain the party’s central task for at least 100 years. Such a pragmatic approach ensured China’s rise to become the world’s second-largest economy in merely 30 years.

Alas, the ideological struggle and fervour, those constant themes of Mao’s era that Deng tried very hard to bury, are back with a vengeance.

Deng’s guiding philosophy that pursuing economic development should be the party’s central task is rarely mentioned 30 years on, and has become secondary to national security.

His mantra of “seeking truth from facts”, epitomised by the folksy saying “it doesn’t matter if a cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice”, has long been upended. Instead, China’s politics and policymaking process these days are driven by ideology, which has caused considerable concerns among foreign investors and private businesspeople in the country.

On China’s international relations, the leadership has long abandoned another of Deng’s dictums, “hiding one’s strength and biding one’s time”, instead openly clashing with the United States and its allies across ideological lines and over values.

The leadership’s supporters have argued that the time has arrived for China, now one of the world’s largest economies, to flex its muscles and protect its interests robustly on the international stage, not least because the country is already the elephant in the room, and not to mention the fact that Washington no longer sees Beijing as weak and poor but as its fiercest competitor or the biggest threat in the world.

While this may be true, Deng would not have approved of the new narrative driven by hubris, which sounds certain of the West’s irreversible downward trajectory, as popularised by the refrain, “The East is rising while the West is declining”.

The catchphrase brings to mind a similar expression uttered by Mao, who declared in the 1950s that “the East wind is prevailing over the West wind”, implying that the forces of socialism would overwhelm those of capitalism.

Deng Xiaoping tries on a cowboy hat presented to him at a rodeo in Simonton, Texas, on February 2, 1979. Photo: AP

Such an ideology-driven world view will most likely see China losing friends and alienating people around the world, particularly in Western countries.

Let’s be honest. When Deng adopted the open-door policy to steer the country onto the right track, China opened up essentially to Western countries, which have brought in investment and technology.

Now that China, the world’s largest trading economy, is a top trading partner to 120 countries, Western countries still account for a large portion of investment and trade.

At a time of unabated Western chatter about decoupling from China, Beijing is wisely seeking deeper integration into the world economy as a counter move. Over the past year, China has signalled a conciliatory approach towards its Western trading partners to defuse trade tensions and reassure the private sector at home.

But China’s leadership faces growing scepticism at home and abroad partly because the country’s public discourse still seems hijacked by the ultra-leftist narrative that is fixated on guarding against foreign influence in the name of national security and patriotism.

Deng, a pragmatist who was purged three times, repeatedly warned that the party should primarily guard against an ultra-leftist tendency, even as it should stay vigilant against veering right.

Nothing would please Deng more if his successors would heed his warning and shift the focus back onto growing the economy and achieving China’s modernisation.

By: Wang Xiangwei – a former editor-in-chief of the South China Morning Post. He now teaches journalism at Baptist University

Source: South China Morning Post

You Might Also Like

Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together

America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying

From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label

How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs

Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article The Dangerous Decline in Israeli Strategy Zionism’s Strategic Missteps: How Israel’s Hubris Is Leading to Isolation and Conflict – by Stephen Walt
Next Article Kais Saied’s Policies and Practices May Lead to an Explosion in Tunisia Kais Saied’s Governance: A Precarious Turn Towards Authoritarianism in Tunisia
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Not Bismarck, but Bonaparte: Trump’s Foreign Policy and the Risks of Great-Power Collusion
Commentary Geopolitics
U.S.–Israel Rift Widens: Trump Cuts Off Netanyahu as Senior Official Warns of ‘Heavy Price’ Over Gaza Stalemate
Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets
Geopolitics Southeast Asia

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?