By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    President Ebrahim Raisi’s Death: What Are the Political and International Perspectives for the Islamic Republic of Iran?
    April 13, 2025
    Foresight*: Pathogens from the Permafrost
    Foresight: Pathogens from the Permafrost — Combating the Spread of an Animal-Borne Disease with or without Russia
    April 13, 2025
    Between the EU and Moscow: How Russia Exploits Divisions in Bosnia
    Between the EU and Moscow: How Russia Exploits Divisions in Bosnia
    August 11, 2024
    Latest News
    Caught in the Heat: How Egypt’s Energy Dreams Turned Into a Strategic Trap
    June 4, 2025
    The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making
    June 3, 2025
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    June 2, 2025
    Canada Seeks Entry Into EU Defense Pact After Trump Missile Demand
    May 29, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    June 2, 2025
    Canada Seeks Entry Into EU Defense Pact After Trump Missile Demand
    May 29, 2025
    SAFE Plan Puts Turkey’s EU Role Back in Spotlight
    May 28, 2025
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Caught in the Heat: How Egypt’s Energy Dreams Turned Into a Strategic Trap
    June 4, 2025
    The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making
    June 3, 2025
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    June 2, 2025
    Trump’s South Africa Standoff
    May 28, 2025
    Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
    May 28, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: China’s Land Appropriation in Bhutan: Strategic Expansion and Diplomatic Pressure
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • My Bookmarks
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
  • My Bookmarks
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Regions > Indo-Pacific > China’s Land Appropriation in Bhutan: Strategic Expansion and Diplomatic Pressure
CommentaryGeopoliticsIndo-Pacific

China’s Land Appropriation in Bhutan: Strategic Expansion and Diplomatic Pressure

Last updated: October 18, 2024 2:29 am
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published October 18, 2024 777 Views 5 Min Read
Share
SHARE


Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

China’s recent actions in Bhutan highlight an ongoing strategic maneuver that has significant geopolitical implications. Over the past eight years, China has built 22 villages on Bhutanese territory, annexing approximately 2% of Bhutan’s land. The primary area of focus is the Doklam plateau, which holds strategic value in China’s border disputes with India. Additionally, China’s expansion into northeastern Bhutan appears to be a tactic to pressure Bhutan into a territorial settlement favorable to Beijing. Despite a 1998 treaty pledging non-aggression, China’s actions demonstrate a hard-power approach that parallels its activities in the South China Sea.

The establishment of villages and settlements within Bhutanese borders, particularly in the western Doklam region and northeastern areas such as Beyul Khenpajong and Menchuma, indicates a calculated initiative by China to bolster its territorial assertions. The Doklam plateau holds notable military importance because of its closeness to India’s Siliguri Corridor, a narrow and strategically crucial area of land. By exerting control over certain areas of this region, China could strengthen its strategic position regarding India, with which it has persistent border disputes.

Conversely, China’s manoeuvres in northeastern Bhutan—an area that does not possess clear strategic importance—serve mainly as a means of diplomatic pressure. During the 1980s and 1990s, China put forward a “package deal,” suggesting that it would relinquish its claims in the northeast in exchange for Bhutan ceding portions of its western territory, including Doklam. Through the establishment of villages in these northeastern regions, China has skillfully leveraged the fear of territorial loss to compel Bhutan into making concessions in its western sector. The gradual shift of these regions from Bhutanese to Chinese control, accompanied by a lack of substantial international response, underscores China’s strategic methodology.

The importance of China’s actions in Bhutan extends beyond mere territorial expansion. This indicates a wider pattern in China’s foreign policy, where smaller neighbouring countries are influenced through gradual, non-aggressive strategies that reinforce advantages progressively. Comparable tactics have been noted in the South China Sea, where China has constructed artificial islands and military facilities to reinforce its territorial assertions. In Bhutan, these actions represent a blend of military positioning, diplomatic leverage, and the establishment of “facts on the ground” that reinforce China’s presence without engaging in direct conflict.

The situation in Bhutan is delicate. The small size and limited resources of Bhutan create challenges in addressing China’s actions, particularly due to Bhutan’s dependence on India for security. Nevertheless, the 2007 India-Bhutan treaty complicates Bhutan’s capacity to engage independently with China, as India’s consent is required for any territorial concessions that may impact its security. Consequently, Bhutan finds itself in a challenging position between two influential neighbors—China, which is pushing for territorial concessions, and India, whose security concerns limit Bhutan’s ability to engage in diplomatic negotiations.

The actions of China in Bhutan bring forth considerable apprehension regarding the future of territorial disputes across Asia. Through a combination of military, diplomatic, and economic pressure, China is establishing a model for its interactions with smaller neighbouring countries moving forward. The lack of substantial international response or intervention regarding China’s annexation of Bhutanese territory may encourage additional expansionist actions in the region, especially in disputed areas along China’s borders.

In summary, China’s land appropriation in Bhutan represents a strategic manoeuvre that further enhances its military and diplomatic objectives. The continuous development of villages within Bhutanese territory, along with diplomatic pressure, illustrates China’s wider approach of employing territorial expansion to secure strategic benefits while avoiding direct confrontation. This situation highlights the difficulties encountered by small states navigating the influence of dominant neighbours, while also prompting the international community to consider how to address territorial encroachment by significant powers such as China.

Read the full article here.

You Might Also Like

Caught in the Heat: How Egypt’s Energy Dreams Turned Into a Strategic Trap

The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making

Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age

Canada Seeks Entry Into EU Defense Pact After Trump Missile Demand

Trump’s South Africa Standoff

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Forging a Nuclear Path: China’s Strategic Rise to Atomic Power
Next Article Why the Gülen Movement Will Remain United and Grow Stronger Both in Turkey and Internationally After the Death of Its Founder
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
Commentary Economy Eurasia Geopolitics
Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground
Commentary Geopolitics
Why a Stronger Yuan Could Be China’s Boldest Bet Yet
Commentary Economy Geopolitics
Trump’s Self-Sabotage Is Hurting the Dollar—and America’s Future
Commentary Economy Geopolitics

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?