By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    China, Russia and the future of peacebuilding
    China, Russia and the future of peacebuilding
    April 13, 2025
    Gaza: a Humanitarian Emergency
    April 13, 2025
    Think China can already take Taiwan easily? Think again
    August 12, 2024
    Latest News
    Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
    May 13, 2025
    America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying
    May 13, 2025
    From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label
    May 13, 2025
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
    IAEA Raises Fresh Alarm on Global Nuclear Security Amid Rise in Radioactive Incidents
    March 2, 2025
    Turkey Successfully Tests Tayfun Ballistic Missile, Doubling Strike Range
    February 5, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together
    May 13, 2025
    America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying
    May 13, 2025
    From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label
    May 13, 2025
    How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs
    May 11, 2025
    Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise
    May 11, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Regions > Southeast Asia > China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets
GeopoliticsSoutheast Asia

China Publicly Labels U.S. and Japanese Destroyers as Enemy Targets

Last updated: April 25, 2025 2:11 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published April 25, 2025 115 Views 4 Min Read
Share
SHARE

In a rare and pointed display of military signaling, China’s navy has publicly identified U.S. and Japanese warships as enemy targets during a naval open day, drawing attention amid rising tensions in the Taiwan Strait.

During the public tour of the Nanjing, a Type 052D guided-missile destroyer in Taizhou, visitors saw an onboard display naming the U.S. Arleigh Burke-class and Japan’s Atago-class destroyers as “enemy surface vessels.” The information was part of an exhibit promoting the YJ-18A, a long-range, supersonic anti-ship cruise missile.

“The YJ-18A can strike large and medium-sized enemy surface vessels such as the U.S. Arleigh Burke-class and Japan’s Atago-class destroyers,” the display read. The exhibit touted the missile’s accuracy, supersonic terminal speed, and ability to boost China’s maritime strike capabilities.

The timing of the display appeared deliberate, coinciding with the passage of the USS William P. Lawrence, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, through the Taiwan Strait. The move, labeled “routine” by U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, sparked a strong response from Chinese military officials, who accused the United States of provocation.

Senior Colonel Shi Yi, spokesperson for the PLA’s Eastern Theatre Command, said Chinese forces took “lawful countermeasures” in response to the transit, and the military released footage of the U.S. warship. At a separate briefing, Defense Ministry spokesperson Zhang Xiaogang warned that U.S. support for Taiwan would “backfire” and urged Washington to stop escalating tensions.

Military observers say the decision to publicly name adversary vessels during peacetime marks a shift in China’s defense communications. Analysts argue it reflects growing confidence within the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and signals its readiness to deter what it sees as foreign encroachment.

Wang Yanan, editor-in-chief of Aerospace Knowledge, said the public mention of the U.S. and Japanese destroyers shows “clear internal consensus” within the PLA. He noted that the YJ-18A’s reported range of more than 600 kilometers and terminal speed exceeding Mach 3 gives it a significant advantage over older systems like the U.S. Harpoon missile, which remains subsonic and has a shorter reach.

“In a one-on-one encounter, a Type 052D can engage an Arleigh Burke from outside its strike range,” Wang said, noting the PLA’s confidence in its close-in weapon systems to intercept return fire.

Japan’s Atago-class destroyers, with similar features to later Arleigh Burke variants, are seen as offering limited additional defense against the YJ-18A, Wang added.

The development comes as Japan invests in next-generation Aegis destroyers with advanced radar systems, expected to enter service by 2028. Meanwhile, China has continued to highlight its modernization efforts, including unveiling its 10,000-ton Type 055 destroyer.

China’s identification of named enemy vessels marks a new phase in regional military posturing. While it is not unusual for militaries to plan against potential adversaries, publicly identifying them in this manner during peacetime is seen by analysts as a deliberate form of strategic messaging.

The move reflects the broader trend of hardening rhetoric and military preparedness in the Indo-Pacific as U.S.-China tensions persist over Taiwan and regional maritime control.

Read more here.

You Might Also Like

Caught in the Middle: Why Middle Powers Still Struggle to Act Together

America’s Soft Power Isn’t Sleeping – It’s Dying

From the West Bank to Columbia University: The Expanding Reach of Israel’s Terrorism Label

How Presidents Lose a Generation: Johnson in ’68, Biden in ’24, and the Politics of Bombs

Potemkin Superpower: Exposing China’s Fragile Economic Rise

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
Next Article The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Not Bismarck, but Bonaparte: Trump’s Foreign Policy and the Risks of Great-Power Collusion
Commentary Geopolitics
U.S.–Israel Rift Widens: Trump Cuts Off Netanyahu as Senior Official Warns of ‘Heavy Price’ Over Gaza Stalemate
Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
The Saudi-Israeli Blueprint: From Arab revolt, 9/11 to Assad’s Downfall
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
Commentary Geopolitics Security

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?