By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    NATO’s direct funding arrangements: Who decides and who pays?
    How does NATO get its funding? Who makes the decisions and who pays?
    April 13, 2025
    How Russia Is Recruiting for the Long War
    How Russia Is Recruiting for the Long War
    August 12, 2024
    China’s Currency Campaign
    China’s Currency Campaign
    July 4, 2024
    Latest News
    Canada Seeks Entry Into EU Defense Pact After Trump Missile Demand
    May 29, 2025
    Trump’s South Africa Standoff
    May 28, 2025
    Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
    May 28, 2025
    Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground
    May 28, 2025
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    Canada Seeks Entry Into EU Defense Pact After Trump Missile Demand
    May 29, 2025
    SAFE Plan Puts Turkey’s EU Role Back in Spotlight
    May 28, 2025
    The Fracturing Nuclear Order and the Uneasy Dawn of a Third Nuclear Age
    April 25, 2025
    Indonesia Eyes Partnership in Turkey’s KAAN Fighter Jet Program Amid Deepening Defense Ties
    April 14, 2025
    Turkey vs. Israel in a Hypothetical War: The Myths and the Realities
    April 10, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Trump’s South Africa Standoff
    May 28, 2025
    Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine
    May 28, 2025
    Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground
    May 28, 2025
    Why a Stronger Yuan Could Be China’s Boldest Bet Yet
    May 28, 2025
    Trump’s Self-Sabotage Is Hurting the Dollar—and America’s Future
    May 28, 2025
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Reading: Bear Hug Diplomacy: The U.S. Role in Escalating the Israel-Gaza War
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Jobs
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Jobs
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Commentary > Bear Hug Diplomacy: The U.S. Role in Escalating the Israel-Gaza War
CommentaryGeopolitics

Bear Hug Diplomacy: The U.S. Role in Escalating the Israel-Gaza War

Last updated: October 11, 2024 9:56 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published October 11, 2024 309 Views 4 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

The article provides a critical evaluation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict strategy implemented by U.S. President Joe Biden subsequent to Hamas’s October 7 attack. Biden’s unwavering support for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, both militarily and diplomatically, is characterized as a failure to achieve critical U.S. objectives in Gaza one year after the attack occurred. These objectives encompassed the prevention of a regional conflict, the protection of Palestinian civilians, the safeguarding of hostages, and the elimination of Hamas.

The situation has deteriorated significantly in spite of these intentions. The humanitarian crisis has reached extreme levels, and Gaza is in ruins, with over 42,000 Palestinians reported deceased. Hamas has not been entirely eradicated by Israel, and numerous detainees continue to be held captive. Furthermore, the war has expanded to Lebanon, and cease-fire negotiations have been unsuccessful, raising the possibility of a more extensive conflict that includes Iran.

The article underscores that the Biden administration’s actions have also contributed to the situation, despite the fact that Israel, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran bear significant responsibility for the violence. In spite of the increasing number of civilian casualties, the administration’s failure to exert substantial pressure on Israel has undermined U.S. diplomacy. The article emphasizes the administration’s failure to impose meaningful consequences, its fast-tracking of military aid to Israel, and its early rejection of cease-fire calls, despite violations of international law. Despite the fact that certain U.S. officials expressed apprehensions regarding the humanitarian disaster in Gaza, the administration continued to provide military support to Israel without any explicit boundaries.

Additionally, the United States has been largely unsuccessful in its efforts to regulate the postwar situation. Israeli actions have impeded the implementation of strategies to prevent the reoccupation of Gaza and the displacement of Palestinians. The limits of the Biden administration’s influence are emphasized by its management of Israel’s invasion of Rafah, a critical border town in Gaza. Despite Biden’s warning that an invasion of Rafah would violate a “red line,” the administration downplayed the operation when Israeli tanks entered the area, indicating to Israel that it had unrestricted military operations.

Additionally, the article emphasizes the regional implications that are more extensive. The United States has been brought closer to a potential conflict with Iran as a result of Israel’s expansion of the war into Lebanon, which includes operations that target Hezbollah.. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has been able to proceed without any significant repercussions as a result of the administration’s inconsistent messaging, which has warned Israel against escalation in Lebanon while simultaneously ensuring unconditional support. Tensions have been further exacerbated by Iran’s response of launching missile attacks against Israel.

In summary, the article contends that the United States’ policy has been unsuccessful in both diplomatic and strategic terms as a consequence of Biden’s unwavering support for Israel. The author urges the Biden administration to condition military assistance to Israel on compliance with international law and to strive for a political solution that addresses the core causes of the conflict, thereby advocating for a fundamental shift in U.S. policy. The article cautions that the conflict will persist in destabilizing the region and harming U.S. interests in the absence of this change.

Read the full article here.

You Might Also Like

Canada Seeks Entry Into EU Defense Pact After Trump Missile Demand

Trump’s South Africa Standoff

Can Sanctions Win a War? The Case of Russia and Ukraine

Frozen Ambitions: How the Kremlin Made the Arctic Its Next Battleground

Why a Stronger Yuan Could Be China’s Boldest Bet Yet

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Russian Encirclement of Pokrovsk: The Looming Military and Economic Blow to Ukraine
Next Article China’s Currency Shift: Balancing Global Markets and the Path to De-dollarization
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

Trump’s Self-Sabotage Is Hurting the Dollar—and America’s Future
Commentary Economy Geopolitics
SAFE Plan Puts Turkey’s EU Role Back in Spotlight
Europe Geopolitics Security
From Bibi to Business Zones: Trump’s Soft Power Mirage
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa
From Ally to Afterthought: Netanyahu Faces Trump’s Cold Shoulder
Commentary Geopolitics Middle East & Africa

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?