Germany’s Budget Compromise: Cutting Corners is a Losing Strategy

The study  provides an analysis of Germany’s 2025 budget compromise and its implications. The governing coalition, consisting of the SPD, Greens, and the FDP, reached a compromise that involves minimal overall savings but significant cuts in specific areas, particularly in foreign aid and defense.

Key Points:

1. Budget Compromise Details:
   • The SPD and Greens protected their core priorities.
   • The FDP, led by Finance Minister Christian Lindner, achieved nominal overall savings.
   • Significant cuts include a 47% reduction in humanitarian assistance and crisis management, and large cuts to development aid and food aid.
2. Defense and Aid Cuts:
   • Despite slashing foreign aid, defense procurement contracts are being signed without allocated funding.
   • The strategy aims to maintain fiscal discipline but risks long-term strategic costs.
3. Political and Strategic Implications:
   • The cuts could undermine Germany’s international influence and commitments.
   • The coalition’s decision is seen as a short-term political maneuver influenced by upcoming elections and the FDP’s need to appeal to its fiscally conservative base.
4. Impact on Development and Humanitarian Efforts:
   • The Development Ministry (BMZ) faces large budget cuts, affecting crisis response, climate adaptation, and CO2 reduction investments.
   • Cuts to humanitarian aid will affect support for Syrian refugees and other crisis-affected populations.
5. Defense Spending Challenges:
   • The coalition faces the dilemma of increasing defense capabilities without raising taxes or debt, leading to a deferred financial burden on future governments.
   • The Bundeswehr’s combat readiness is compromised by budget constraints despite the Zeitenwende commitment to military strengthening.
6. Coalition Dynamics:
   • The SPD and Greens resist cuts to social spending, leaving foreign aid and development as the primary areas for savings.
   • Public opinion favors cutting foreign aid over domestic spending, influencing budget decisions.
7. Future Risks:
   • The budget compromise is seen as strategically short-sighted, potentially leading to increased costs and reduced international trust in the long term.
   • The upcoming general election and the FDP’s political survival are key factors driving the budget decisions.

This analysis highlights the complex interplay between fiscal policy, political strategy, and long-term strategic interests in Germany’s budgetary decisions​.

Read the full explainer to find out.

Rotmann_2024_Budget-Compromise_Final