By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
    Geopolitics
    Discover professional insights into international relations, regional conflicts, and global power dynamics by visiting Geopolist. Keep up on the ways in which these changes impact…
    Show More
    Top News
    Operation Spiderweb: The Death of Strategic Depth in the Drone Age
    August 6, 2025
    The End of Vertical War: Operation Spiderweb and the Rise of Horizontal War-Making
    August 6, 2025
    Exploiting Geopolitical Disruptions: Strategic Opportunities in an Unstable World
    August 27, 2024
    Latest News
    Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal
    January 26, 2026
    Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF
    January 24, 2026
    The Day After the SDF: Turkey’s Salafism Gamble—and Bilal Erdoğan’s Succession Pipeline
    January 22, 2026
    Salafi Consolidation: Is Iraq—and the KRG—Next After Syria and Yemen?
    January 19, 2026
  • Security
    SecurityShow More
    Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies
    December 26, 2025
    Ahmed al-Ahmed: The Hero Islamophobes and Anti-Immigrant Voices Did Not Expect
    December 15, 2025
    Five Turkish defense firms enter SIPRI Top 100 with record $10.1 billion in 2024 sales
    December 1, 2025
    Turkey’s Kızılelma drone fires radar-guided missile in beyond-visual-range test
    December 1, 2025
    More Than Mischief: How a Weakened Moscow Seeks to Dismantle NATO from Within
    September 21, 2025
  • Commentary
    CommentaryShow More
    Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal
    January 26, 2026
    Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF
    January 24, 2026
    The Day After the SDF: Turkey’s Salafism Gamble—and Bilal Erdoğan’s Succession Pipeline
    January 22, 2026
    Salafi Consolidation: Is Iraq—and the KRG—Next After Syria and Yemen?
    January 19, 2026
    Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?
    January 12, 2026
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Reading: China’s Adaptive Maritime Strategy: Coast Guard Dominance and the Latent Role of the Maritime Militia Around Taiwan
Share
Notification Show More
Font ResizerAa
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for GeopoliticsGeopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics
Font ResizerAa
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
  • Regions
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
  • Home
  • Geopolitics
  • Security
  • Commentary
  • Economy
    • Energy
  • Regions
    • Europe
    • Middle East & Africa
    • Eurasia
  • Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
    • Job Dashboard
    • Jobs
    • Post a Job
  • Register
  • My Bookmarks
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
  • Advertise
© 2022 Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics > Blog > Regions > Southeast Asia > China’s Adaptive Maritime Strategy: Coast Guard Dominance and the Latent Role of the Maritime Militia Around Taiwan
CommentaryGeopoliticsSoutheast Asia

China’s Adaptive Maritime Strategy: Coast Guard Dominance and the Latent Role of the Maritime Militia Around Taiwan

Last updated: December 25, 2024 5:08 pm
By GEOPOLIST | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics Published December 25, 2024 650 Views 3 Min Read
Share
SHARE

Summary by Geopolist | Istanbul Center for Geopolitics:

The article provides an in-depth analysis of China’s maritime strategy around Taiwan, highlighting the notable absence of its maritime militia in gray zone operations. Traditionally, the maritime militia has played a significant role in the South China Sea, conducting operations such as enforcing territorial claims, obstructing foreign vessels, and gathering intelligence under the guise of civilian fishing activities. However, in the Taiwan Strait, Beijing appears to rely almost exclusively on its coast guard forces.

This strategic shift might be ascribed to multiple variables. The limited geographical expanse of the Taiwan Strait and its closeness to mainland China enable the coast guard to sustain a continuous presence without necessitating additional help from the militia. Moreover, Beijing’s aim with Taiwan diverges from its policy in the South China Sea. The former entails sustaining ambiguous, non-escalatory supremacy, whereas the Taiwan Strait operations seek to overtly scare Taipei and heighten its sense of unease. The coast guard, possessing evident authority and armament, is more appropriate for these purposes.

Despite their limited visibility in current operations, maritime militia units in Fujian Province remain a potent force. Fujian’s fishing industry has been deeply integrated with military planning, creating a well-organized militia structure capable of supporting gray zone activities if needed. Militia forces have participated in joint drills with the coast guard, signaling their readiness for future deployments.

The essay posits that China’s choice to refrain from fully utilizing its marine militia near Taiwan is indicative of strategic and operational factors, rather than an absence of capabilities. As tensions in the Taiwan Strait develop, Beijing may deploy these forces for particular functions, like enforcing a blockade, instigating incidents to rationalize military intervention, or augmenting coast guard operations in critical regions.

In summary, although the marine militia is not a significant element of China’s present Taiwan strategy, it exists as a dormant force that might assume a crucial role should Beijing opt to intensify its efforts against the island. This measured caution underscores Beijing’s flexible strategy in pursuing its geopolitical objectives while mitigating the dangers of provocation and escalation.

Read the full article here.

You Might Also Like

Jeffrey’s Autonomy Model for Syria Matches NAT’s Earlier Proposal

Strategic and Ideological Missteps of Syria’s SDF

The Day After the SDF: Turkey’s Salafism Gamble—and Bilal Erdoğan’s Succession Pipeline

Salafi Consolidation: Is Iraq—and the KRG—Next After Syria and Yemen?

Great-Power Condominium or Great-Power Mirage?

Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Email Print
Previous Article Charting Syria’s Future: U.S. Strategy and Regional Dynamics in Postwar Reconstruction
Next Article Trumpflation and Its Economic Ripples: The Bank of Japan’s Looming Challenges
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stay Connected

TwitterFollow
YoutubeSubscribe

Latest News

This Week’s Global Fault Lines: Venezuela, Greenland, and the New Coercion (Jan 01–07, 2026)
Geopolitics
Global Fault Lines: Weekly Developments Across Key Geopolitical Theaters (Dec 22–28, 2025)
Geopolitics
Gaza, Not Ankara: The Real Motive Behind Israel’s Somaliland Recognition
Commentary Geopolitics Human Rights Middle East & Africa
Erdoğan’s Self-Inflicted Airpower Wounds: How Turkey Lost the Skies
Commentary Defence Technology Geopolitics Middle East & Africa

Find Us on Socials

© GeoPolist. All Rights Reserved.
  • Submit an Op-Ed + Risk Advisory
  • Jobs
  • Post Jobs & Ads for Free
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Register Lost your password?